That is the proposal. That it is unlikely to be possible for there to be equivalence on the right and left. Now that is an awkward statement or phrasing of the* obvious.
There is difficulty comparing anything at opposite ends of the political spectrum, let alone** middles. The Olbermann/Beck comparison is along the lines of journalism more than parody. Limbaugh along the lines of Colbert more than Olbermann. It may be along the lines of who is pulling whose leg for whom. That's the gravitas!
To paraphrase the difficulty for which there is more work needed, parody may be more difficult for those in power. But this may confuse parody with satire, or either with having a point, confounded by the(~)irony of being direct about the point in a world of hypocrisy.
(FP1)
(awkward): A. "Comedian Rush Limbaugh", B. Whatcha gonna do about it?
*12-29-14 (of the): A. Para-model, b. ..., c. ..., d. ..., e. ... , f. ... , g. ... h. BtU , I. What the Beck? , j. ... , k., (l.) ..., (m.) ... (note font size A. & I. = Normal Ctrl F "of the left")
** or muddle is the hume or...(FP!)
( comparison) : A. The Billy Club..., B.Genre Clash, C.
(gravitas): A. 4Mat, B. Way, Too Point Oh?, C. Or ask for a third, D. Funneling Crisis?
ticket: A. Hump Day?, B. The New Compendium, C. Primary Boogeyman, D. Not to make light..., (...) R. Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ? ... (...)
(FP!) It is important to note that I have barely finished processing much of what I have included above @ ** in particular.
 |
| PaxOnBothHouses |
 |
| Add caption |
*** not inserted but re~spectrum 'tween *&**.
No comments:
Post a Comment